What's the Best Way to Use Eccentric Loading for Strength?
Recent strength training research challenges the popular belief that accentuated eccentric loading enhances performance in subsequent repetitions.
Content featuring leading researchers and evidence translators.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 study found that training at long muscle lengths with moderate loads and partial range of motion produced hypertrophy equal to full ROM training at high intensity. Here's what that means for how you structure your sessions.
Two new studies in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research show that how you prescribe load and which exercise you choose both shape your results. Here's what lifters can take from them.
A 2026 randomized trial compared RPE-based and percentage-based deadlift programs. Strength gains were similar, but the RPE group reported less fatigue going into each session.
New research shows that consistent training trumps menstrual cycle timing, while motor variability may predict who responds best to strength programs.
A 2024 study reveals that timing training around menstrual cycles offers no advantage for muscle growth or strength gains compared to consistent programming.
New research shows that consistent training trumps menstrual cycle timing, while motor variability may predict who responds best to strength programs.
A 2024 study reveals that timing training around menstrual cycles offers no advantage for muscle growth or strength gains compared to consistent programming.
Two new studies in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research show that how you prescribe load and which exercise you choose both shape your results. Here's what lifters can take from them.
A 2026 randomized trial compared RPE-based and percentage-based deadlift programs. Strength gains were similar, but the RPE group reported less fatigue going into each session.
This week's research looks at resistance training for cyclists and split-set training in handball players — and together they make a clear case for programming intensity with precision, not just effort.
A 2026 study on youth handball players found split-set training outperformed failure training on one power metric — but not on strength, muscle size, or athletic performance. Here's what that means for how you program your sets.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 controlled trial found that high-load resistance training outperforms blood flow restriction for lateral gastrocnemius hypertrophy, while both methods produce similar results in the soleus. The difference comes down to muscle fiber type.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 study found that training at long muscle lengths with moderate loads and partial range of motion produced hypertrophy equal to full ROM training at high intensity. Here's what that means for how you structure your sessions.
A new within-subject trial shows both fixed and progressed loads built muscle for two months. The difference appeared in the final weeks, as the fixed load drifted further from failure.
A 2026 study found that doubling your weekly resistance training volume doesn't impair muscle growth compared to modest increases — but the details matter for how you apply this.
New research shows that consistent training trumps menstrual cycle timing, while motor variability may predict who responds best to strength programs.
A 2024 study reveals that timing training around menstrual cycles offers no advantage for muscle growth or strength gains compared to consistent programming.
A new within-subject trial shows both fixed and progressed loads built muscle for two months. The difference appeared in the final weeks, as the fixed load drifted further from failure.
Three new studies published in 2026 converge on a single, practical insight: volume and proximity to failure both matter — but context determines how much, and for whom.
A 2026 study found that doubling your weekly resistance training volume doesn't impair muscle growth compared to modest increases — but the details matter for how you apply this.
Three new studies published in 2026 converge on a single, practical insight: volume and proximity to failure both matter — but context determines how much, and for whom.
A 2026 randomised crossover study found that training closer to failure increases neuromuscular and metabolic fatigue — but the right stopping point depends on your exercise and load, not a single universal rule.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 study found that training at long muscle lengths with moderate loads and partial range of motion produced hypertrophy equal to full ROM training at high intensity. Here's what that means for how you structure your sessions.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 study found that training at long muscle lengths with moderate loads and partial range of motion produced hypertrophy equal to full ROM training at high intensity. Here's what that means for how you structure your sessions.
New research shows that consistent training trumps menstrual cycle timing, while motor variability may predict who responds best to strength programs.
A 2024 study reveals that timing training around menstrual cycles offers no advantage for muscle growth or strength gains compared to consistent programming.
Two new studies in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research show that how you prescribe load and which exercise you choose both shape your results. Here's what lifters can take from them.
A 2026 randomized trial compared RPE-based and percentage-based deadlift programs. Strength gains were similar, but the RPE group reported less fatigue going into each session.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 controlled trial found that high-load resistance training outperforms blood flow restriction for lateral gastrocnemius hypertrophy, while both methods produce similar results in the soleus. The difference comes down to muscle fiber type.
A new within-subject trial shows both fixed and progressed loads built muscle for two months. The difference appeared in the final weeks, as the fixed load drifted further from failure.
A 2026 study found that doubling your weekly resistance training volume doesn't impair muscle growth compared to modest increases — but the details matter for how you apply this.
A new within-subject trial shows both fixed and progressed loads built muscle for two months. The difference appeared in the final weeks, as the fixed load drifted further from failure.
Three new studies published in 2026 converge on a single, practical insight: volume and proximity to failure both matter — but context determines how much, and for whom.
A 2026 study found that doubling your weekly resistance training volume doesn't impair muscle growth compared to modest increases — but the details matter for how you apply this.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 study found that training at long muscle lengths with moderate loads and partial range of motion produced hypertrophy equal to full ROM training at high intensity. Here's what that means for how you structure your sessions.
Two new studies challenge the assumption that heavier loads always produce better muscle adaptations. The real variable worth tracking may be where in the range of motion you're actually training.
A 2026 controlled trial found that high-load resistance training outperforms blood flow restriction for lateral gastrocnemius hypertrophy, while both methods produce similar results in the soleus. The difference comes down to muscle fiber type.
Three new studies published in 2026 converge on a single, practical insight: volume and proximity to failure both matter — but context determines how much, and for whom.
A 2026 randomised crossover study found that training closer to failure increases neuromuscular and metabolic fatigue — but the right stopping point depends on your exercise and load, not a single universal rule.
Three new studies published in 2026 converge on a single, practical insight: volume and proximity to failure both matter — but context determines how much, and for whom.
A 2026 randomised crossover study found that training closer to failure increases neuromuscular and metabolic fatigue — but the right stopping point depends on your exercise and load, not a single universal rule.
Two new studies in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research show that how you prescribe load and which exercise you choose both shape your results. Here's what lifters can take from them.
A 2026 randomized trial compared RPE-based and percentage-based deadlift programs. Strength gains were similar, but the RPE group reported less fatigue going into each session.
Two new studies in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research show that how you prescribe load and which exercise you choose both shape your results. Here's what lifters can take from them.
A 10-week MRI study found that hip extension and hip abduction grow different regions of the gluteus maximus. Here's what that means for how you program glute work.
Three new studies published in 2026 converge on a single, practical insight: volume and proximity to failure both matter — but context determines how much, and for whom.
A 2026 randomised crossover study found that training closer to failure increases neuromuscular and metabolic fatigue — but the right stopping point depends on your exercise and load, not a single universal rule.
Two new studies in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research show that how you prescribe load and which exercise you choose both shape your results. Here's what lifters can take from them.
A 2026 randomized trial compared RPE-based and percentage-based deadlift programs. Strength gains were similar, but the RPE group reported less fatigue going into each session.
New research shows that consistent training trumps menstrual cycle timing, while motor variability may predict who responds best to strength programs.
A 2024 study reveals that timing training around menstrual cycles offers no advantage for muscle growth or strength gains compared to consistent programming.
A 2026 meta-analysis confirms that young lifters can build muscle at every maturational stage, but the size of the adaptation depends heavily on age, puberty status, and what you're comparing it against.
Two new studies published in 2026 converge on a clear message: training to momentary failure isn't required for comparable adaptations, and learning to gauge your own effort accurately is a skill anyone can develop.
This week's research looks at resistance training for cyclists and split-set training in handball players — and together they make a clear case for programming intensity with precision, not just effort.
A 2026 study on youth handball players found split-set training outperformed failure training on one power metric — but not on strength, muscle size, or athletic performance. Here's what that means for how you program your sets.
Three new studies published in 2026 converge on a single, practical insight: volume and proximity to failure both matter — but context determines how much, and for whom.
A 2026 randomised crossover study found that training closer to failure increases neuromuscular and metabolic fatigue — but the right stopping point depends on your exercise and load, not a single universal rule.